dsProject/dsLightRag/Topic/JiHe/kv_store_llm_response_cache.json

{
  "default": {
    "072b54ce570935e68aaaf44943207fde": {
      "return": "(\"entity\"<|>\"Triangle ABC\"<|>\"geo\"<|>\"Triangle ABC is the geometric figure used to demonstrate the triangle inequality theorem.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Triangle Inequality\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"The triangle inequality theorem states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the remaining side.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate is a fundamental principle in geometry, used here to compare angles and sides in the proof.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Proposition 19\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"Proposition 19 from Euclid's Elements states that in any triangle, the greater angle is subtended by the greater side.\")##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"Triangle ABC\"<|>\"Triangle Inequality\"<|>\"Triangle ABC is used to demonstrate the triangle inequality theorem, showing the relationship between its sides.\"<|>\"geometric proof, inequality\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate\"<|>\"Proposition 19\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate is used alongside Proposition 19 to establish the relationship between angles and sides in the proof.\"<|>\"geometric principles, angle-side relationship\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"Triangle Inequality\"<|>\"Proposition 19\"<|>\"Proposition 19 is applied to prove the triangle inequality by comparing angles and corresponding sides.\"<|>\"proof technique, geometric logic\"<|>7)##\n(\"content_keywords\"<|>\"geometry, triangle inequality, Euclid's Elements, proof, angles and sides\")<|COMPLETE|>",
      "cache_type": "extract",
      "chunk_id": "chunk-a5e3dacee89618f913c4948b6ffe64ec",
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "---Goal---\nGiven a text document that is potentially relevant to this activity and a list of entity types, identify all entities of those types from the text and all relationships among the identified entities.\nUse English as output language.\n\n---Steps---\n1. Identify all entities. For each identified entity, extract the following information:\n- entity_name: Name of the entity, use same language as input text. If English, capitalized the name.\n- entity_type: One of the following types: [organization,person,geo,event,category]\n- entity_description: Comprehensive description of the entity's attributes and activities\nFormat each entity as (\"entity\"<|><entity_name><|><entity_type><|><entity_description>)\n\n2. From the entities identified in step 1, identify all pairs of (source_entity, target_entity) that are *clearly related* to each other.\nFor each pair of related entities, extract the following information:\n- source_entity: name of the source entity, as identified in step 1\n- target_entity: name of the target entity, as identified in step 1\n- relationship_description: explanation as to why you think the source entity and the target entity are related to each other\n- relationship_strength: a numeric score indicating strength of the relationship between the source entity and target entity\n- relationship_keywords: one or more high-level key words that summarize the overarching nature of the relationship, focusing on concepts or themes rather than specific details\nFormat each relationship as (\"relationship\"<|><source_entity><|><target_entity><|><relationship_description><|><relationship_keywords><|><relationship_strength>)\n\n3. Identify high-level key words that summarize the main concepts, themes, or topics of the entire text. These should capture the overarching ideas present in the document.\nFormat the content-level key words as (\"content_keywords\"<|><high_level_keywords>)\n\n4. Return output in English as a single list of all the entities and relationships identified in steps 1 and 2. Use **##** as the list delimiter.\n\n5. When finished, output <|COMPLETE|>\n\n######################\n---Examples---\n######################\nExample 1:\n\nEntity_types: [person, technology, mission, organization, location]\nText:\n```\nwhile Alex clenched his jaw, the buzz of frustration dull against the backdrop of Taylor's authoritarian certainty. It was this competitive undercurrent that kept him alert, the sense that his and Jordan's shared commitment to discovery was an unspoken rebellion against Cruz's narrowing vision of control and order.\n\nThen Taylor did something unexpected. They paused beside Jordan and, for a moment, observed the device with something akin to reverence. \"If this tech can be understood...\" Taylor said, their voice quieter, \"It could change the game for us. For all of us.\"\n\nThe underlying dismissal earlier seemed to falter, replaced by a glimpse of reluctant respect for the gravity of what lay in their hands. Jordan looked up, and for a fleeting heartbeat, their eyes locked with Taylor's, a wordless clash of wills softening into an uneasy truce.\n\nIt was a small transformation, barely perceptible, but one that Alex noted with an inward nod. They had all been brought here by different paths\n```\n\nOutput:\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Alex\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Alex is a character who experiences frustration and is observant of the dynamics among other characters.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Taylor\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Taylor is portrayed with authoritarian certainty and shows a moment of reverence towards a device, indicating a change in perspective.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Jordan\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Jordan shares a commitment to discovery and has a significant interaction with Taylor regarding a device.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Cruz\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Cruz is associated with a vision of control and order, influencing the dynamics among other characters.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"The Device\"<|>\"technology\"<|>\"The Device is central to the story, with potential game-changing implicatio
    },
    "2e675f48b286783837db3691b44f16d1": {
      "return": "(\"entity\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"geo\"<|>\"三角形ABC is the specific triangle used to demonstrate the geometric proof of the triangle inequality theorem.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"三角不等式 (Triangle Inequality) is a fundamental theorem in geometry stating that the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理 (Euclid's Fifth Postulate) is a classical geometric principle used in this proof to compare angles.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"几何原本 (Elements of Geometry) is Euclid's foundational mathematical work containing Proposition 19, referenced in this proof.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"命题19\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"命题19 (Proposition 19) states that in any triangle, the greater angle is subtended by the greater side, used in this proof.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"geo\"<|>\"点D (Point D) is an auxiliary point constructed in the proof by extending side AB to create an isosceles triangle.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"geo\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD (Isosceles Triangle BCD) is formed in the proof construction, showing equal angles at its base.\")##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The proof uses triangle ABC to demonstrate the triangle inequality theorem through geometric construction.\"<|>\"geometric proof, inequality demonstration\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"命题19\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate is used to establish angle comparisons that lead to the application of Proposition 19 in the proof.\"<|>\"geometric principles, logical progression\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"Point D is constructed from triangle ABC by extending side AB to create additional geometric relationships.\"<|>\"geometric construction, auxiliary point\"<|>7)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"命题19\"<|>\"The isosceles triangle BCD's angle properties enable the application of Proposition 19 regarding angle-side relationships.\"<|>\"angle properties, proof technique\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"The triangle inequality proof references Euclid's Elements (几何原本) as the source of foundational geometric propositions.\"<|>\"historical reference, mathematical foundation\"<|>7)##\n(\"content_keywords\"<|>\"geometry, triangle inequality, Euclidean geometry, proof techniques, angle-side relationships\")<|COMPLETE|>",
      "cache_type": "extract",
      "chunk_id": "chunk-a5e3dacee89618f913c4948b6ffe64ec",
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"---Goal---\\nGiven a text document that is potentially relevant to this activity and a list of entity types, identify all entities of those types from the text and all relationships among the identified entities.\\nUse English as output language.\\n\\n---Steps---\\n1. Identify all entities. For each identified entity, extract the following information:\\n- entity_name: Name of the entity, use same language as input text. If English, capitalized the name.\\n- entity_type: One of the following types: [organization,person,geo,event,category]\\n- entity_description: Comprehensive description of the entity's attributes and activities\\nFormat each entity as (\\\"entity\\\"<|><entity_name><|><entity_type><|><entity_description>)\\n\\n2. From the entities identified in step 1, identify all pairs of (source_entity, target_entity) that are *clearly related* to each other.\\nFor each pair of related entities, extract the following information:\\n- source_entity: name of the source entity, as identified in step 1\\n- target_entity: name of the target entity, as identified in step 1\\n- relationship_description: explanation as to why you think the source entity and the target entity are related to each other\\n- relationship_strength: a numeric score indicating strength of the relationship between the source entity and target entity\\n- relationship_keywords: one or more high-level key words that summarize the overarching nature of the relationship, focusing on concepts or themes rather than specific details\\nFormat each relationship as (\\\"relationship\\\"<|><source_entity><|><target_entity><|><relationship_description><|><relationship_keywords><|><relationship_strength>)\\n\\n3. Identify high-level key words that summarize the main concepts, themes, or topics of the entire text. These should capture the overarching ideas present in the document.\\nFormat the content-level key words as (\\\"content_keywords\\\"<|><high_level_keywords>)\\n\\n4. Return output in English as a single list of all the entities and relationships identified in steps 1 and 2. Use **##** as the list delimiter.\\n\\n5. When finished, output <|COMPLETE|>\\n\\n######################\\n---Examples---\\n######################\\nExample 1:\\n\\nEntity_types: [person, technology, mission, organization, location]\\nText:\\n```\\nwhile Alex clenched his jaw, the buzz of frustration dull against the backdrop of Taylor's authoritarian certainty. It was this competitive undercurrent that kept him alert, the sense that his and Jordan's shared commitment to discovery was an unspoken rebellion against Cruz's narrowing vision of control and order.\\n\\nThen Taylor did something unexpected. They paused beside Jordan and, for a moment, observed the device with something akin to reverence. \\\"If this tech can be understood...\\\" Taylor said, their voice quieter, \\\"It could change the game for us. For all of us.\\\"\\n\\nThe underlying dismissal earlier seemed to falter, replaced by a glimpse of reluctant respect for the gravity of what lay in their hands. Jordan looked up, and for a fleeting heartbeat, their eyes locked with Taylor's, a wordless clash of wills softening into an uneasy truce.\\n\\nIt was a small transformation, barely perceptible, but one that Alex noted with an inward nod. They had all been brought here by different paths\\n```\\n\\nOutput:\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Alex\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Alex is a character who experiences frustration and is observant of the dynamics among other characters.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Taylor\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Taylor is portrayed with authoritarian certainty and shows a moment of reverence towards a device, indicating a change in perspective.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Jordan\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Jordan shares a commitment to discovery and has a significant interaction with Taylor regarding a device.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Cruz\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Cruz is associated with a vision of control and order, influencing t
    },
    "8844f44112efe313d433402a59d8a0c9": {
      "return": "(\"entity\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"三角形ABC is the geometric figure used to demonstrate the triangle inequality theorem.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"三角不等式 (Triangle Inequality) states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the third side.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理 (Euclid's Fifth Postulate) is a foundational principle in geometry, used here to compare angles.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"organization\"<|>\"几何原本 (Elements) is Euclid's seminal work on geometry, which includes Proposition 19 referenced in the proof.\")##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The triangle ABC is used to demonstrate the validity of the triangle inequality theorem.\"<|>\"mathematical proof, geometry\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate is applied to compare angles in the proof of the triangle inequality.\"<|>\"geometric principles, angle comparison\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The Elements by Euclid provides Proposition 19, which is used to justify the triangle inequality proof.\"<|>\"historical reference, mathematical foundation\"<|>7)##\n(\"content_keywords\"<|>\"geometry, triangle inequality, Euclid's postulates, mathematical proof\")<|COMPLETE|>",
      "cache_type": "extract",
      "chunk_id": "chunk-86997193b152a15921e498b02550a63b",
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "---Goal---\nGiven a text document that is potentially relevant to this activity and a list of entity types, identify all entities of those types from the text and all relationships among the identified entities.\nUse English as output language.\n\n---Steps---\n1. Identify all entities. For each identified entity, extract the following information:\n- entity_name: Name of the entity, use same language as input text. If English, capitalized the name.\n- entity_type: One of the following types: [organization,person,geo,event,category]\n- entity_description: Comprehensive description of the entity's attributes and activities\nFormat each entity as (\"entity\"<|><entity_name><|><entity_type><|><entity_description>)\n\n2. From the entities identified in step 1, identify all pairs of (source_entity, target_entity) that are *clearly related* to each other.\nFor each pair of related entities, extract the following information:\n- source_entity: name of the source entity, as identified in step 1\n- target_entity: name of the target entity, as identified in step 1\n- relationship_description: explanation as to why you think the source entity and the target entity are related to each other\n- relationship_strength: a numeric score indicating strength of the relationship between the source entity and target entity\n- relationship_keywords: one or more high-level key words that summarize the overarching nature of the relationship, focusing on concepts or themes rather than specific details\nFormat each relationship as (\"relationship\"<|><source_entity><|><target_entity><|><relationship_description><|><relationship_keywords><|><relationship_strength>)\n\n3. Identify high-level key words that summarize the main concepts, themes, or topics of the entire text. These should capture the overarching ideas present in the document.\nFormat the content-level key words as (\"content_keywords\"<|><high_level_keywords>)\n\n4. Return output in English as a single list of all the entities and relationships identified in steps 1 and 2. Use **##** as the list delimiter.\n\n5. When finished, output <|COMPLETE|>\n\n######################\n---Examples---\n######################\nExample 1:\n\nEntity_types: [person, technology, mission, organization, location]\nText:\n```\nwhile Alex clenched his jaw, the buzz of frustration dull against the backdrop of Taylor's authoritarian certainty. It was this competitive undercurrent that kept him alert, the sense that his and Jordan's shared commitment to discovery was an unspoken rebellion against Cruz's narrowing vision of control and order.\n\nThen Taylor did something unexpected. They paused beside Jordan and, for a moment, observed the device with something akin to reverence. \"If this tech can be understood...\" Taylor said, their voice quieter, \"It could change the game for us. For all of us.\"\n\nThe underlying dismissal earlier seemed to falter, replaced by a glimpse of reluctant respect for the gravity of what lay in their hands. Jordan looked up, and for a fleeting heartbeat, their eyes locked with Taylor's, a wordless clash of wills softening into an uneasy truce.\n\nIt was a small transformation, barely perceptible, but one that Alex noted with an inward nod. They had all been brought here by different paths\n```\n\nOutput:\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Alex\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Alex is a character who experiences frustration and is observant of the dynamics among other characters.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Taylor\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Taylor is portrayed with authoritarian certainty and shows a moment of reverence towards a device, indicating a change in perspective.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Jordan\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Jordan shares a commitment to discovery and has a significant interaction with Taylor regarding a device.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Cruz\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Cruz is associated with a vision of control and order, influencing the dynamics among other characters.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"The Device\"<|>\"technology\"<|>\"The Device is central to the story, with potential game-changing implicatio
    },
    "f90003b522dbc516e3888d1900cbcb30": {
      "return": "(\"entity\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"三角形ABC is the primary geometric figure used in the proof, demonstrating the triangle inequality theorem through its sides and angles.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"三角不等式 (Triangle Inequality Theorem) states that the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side, forming the core concept being proved.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理 (Euclid's Fifth Postulate) about parallel lines is referenced here to compare angles within the geometric proof.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"organization\"<|>\"几何原本 (Euclid's Elements) serves as the foundational text for this geometric proof, specifically referencing Proposition 19 about angle-side relationships.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"点D is the constructed point in the proof where BD=BC, creating an isosceles triangle BCD for angle comparison purposes.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"直线AB\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"直线AB is extended in the proof's construction phase to create point D and establish necessary geometric relationships.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"线段DC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"线段DC is drawn to form triangle BCD, which becomes crucial for demonstrating angle relationships in the proof.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD is intentionally constructed with BD=BC to create equal base angles for the proof's logical progression.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"命题19\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"命题19 (Proposition 19) from Euclid's Elements establishes that the greater angle of a triangle subtends the greater side, used in the final proof step.\")##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The entire proof revolves around demonstrating the triangle inequality theorem using triangle ABC as the example case.\"<|>\"geometric proof, theorem demonstration\"<|>10)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"Euclid's Fifth Postulate provides the angular comparison principle necessary for proving the triangle inequality.\"<|>\"mathematical foundation, proof support\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"命题19\"<|>\"The Elements contains Proposition 19 which is directly cited as the final justification in the inequality proof.\"<|>\"historical reference, mathematical authority\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"直线AB\"<|>\"Point D is constructed by extending line AB, creating the necessary geometric configuration for the proof.\"<|>\"geometric construction, proof setup\"<|>7)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"The isosceles triangle BCD is formed specifically through the construction of point D with BD=BC.\"<|>\"purposeful construction, logical progression\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"线段DC\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"Line segment DC completes the isosceles triangle BCD, enabling the angle comparisons central to the proof.\"<|>\"geometric completion, angle analysis\"<|>7)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"命题19\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"Proposition 19 provides the final logical step that connects the angle comparisons to the side length inequality.\"<|>\"proof completion, mathematical logic\"<|>9)##\n(\"content_keywords\"<|>\"geometry proof, triangle inequality, Euclidean geometry, mathematical construction, angle-side relationships\")<|COMPLETE|>",
      "cache_type": "extract",
      "chunk_id": "chunk-86997193b152a15921e498b02550a63b",
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"---Goal---\\nGiven a text document that is potentially relevant to this activity and a list of entity types, identify all entities of those types from the text and all relationships among the identified entities.\\nUse English as output language.\\n\\n---Steps---\\n1. Identify all entities. For each identified entity, extract the following information:\\n- entity_name: Name of the entity, use same language as input text. If English, capitalized the name.\\n- entity_type: One of the following types: [organization,person,geo,event,category]\\n- entity_description: Comprehensive description of the entity's attributes and activities\\nFormat each entity as (\\\"entity\\\"<|><entity_name><|><entity_type><|><entity_description>)\\n\\n2. From the entities identified in step 1, identify all pairs of (source_entity, target_entity) that are *clearly related* to each other.\\nFor each pair of related entities, extract the following information:\\n- source_entity: name of the source entity, as identified in step 1\\n- target_entity: name of the target entity, as identified in step 1\\n- relationship_description: explanation as to why you think the source entity and the target entity are related to each other\\n- relationship_strength: a numeric score indicating strength of the relationship between the source entity and target entity\\n- relationship_keywords: one or more high-level key words that summarize the overarching nature of the relationship, focusing on concepts or themes rather than specific details\\nFormat each relationship as (\\\"relationship\\\"<|><source_entity><|><target_entity><|><relationship_description><|><relationship_keywords><|><relationship_strength>)\\n\\n3. Identify high-level key words that summarize the main concepts, themes, or topics of the entire text. These should capture the overarching ideas present in the document.\\nFormat the content-level key words as (\\\"content_keywords\\\"<|><high_level_keywords>)\\n\\n4. Return output in English as a single list of all the entities and relationships identified in steps 1 and 2. Use **##** as the list delimiter.\\n\\n5. When finished, output <|COMPLETE|>\\n\\n######################\\n---Examples---\\n######################\\nExample 1:\\n\\nEntity_types: [person, technology, mission, organization, location]\\nText:\\n```\\nwhile Alex clenched his jaw, the buzz of frustration dull against the backdrop of Taylor's authoritarian certainty. It was this competitive undercurrent that kept him alert, the sense that his and Jordan's shared commitment to discovery was an unspoken rebellion against Cruz's narrowing vision of control and order.\\n\\nThen Taylor did something unexpected. They paused beside Jordan and, for a moment, observed the device with something akin to reverence. \\\"If this tech can be understood...\\\" Taylor said, their voice quieter, \\\"It could change the game for us. For all of us.\\\"\\n\\nThe underlying dismissal earlier seemed to falter, replaced by a glimpse of reluctant respect for the gravity of what lay in their hands. Jordan looked up, and for a fleeting heartbeat, their eyes locked with Taylor's, a wordless clash of wills softening into an uneasy truce.\\n\\nIt was a small transformation, barely perceptible, but one that Alex noted with an inward nod. They had all been brought here by different paths\\n```\\n\\nOutput:\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Alex\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Alex is a character who experiences frustration and is observant of the dynamics among other characters.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Taylor\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Taylor is portrayed with authoritarian certainty and shows a moment of reverence towards a device, indicating a change in perspective.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Jordan\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Jordan shares a commitment to discovery and has a significant interaction with Taylor regarding a device.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Cruz\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Cruz is associated with a vision of control and order, influencing t
    },
    "e2964f3bf055a6184ee6567f524de4a3": {
      "return": "(\"entity\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A geometric figure used in the proof of the triangle inequality, demonstrating relationships between its sides and angles.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A mathematical inequality stating that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the remaining side.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A fundamental postulate in Euclidean geometry, also known as the parallel postulate, used in geometric proofs.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A foundational mathematical text by Euclid, containing definitions, postulates, and propositions that form the basis of classical geometry.\")##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The triangle ABC is used to demonstrate the triangle inequality, proving the relationship between its sides.\"<|>\"geometric proof, inequality\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"Euclid's fifth postulate is a key component of the geometric principles outlined in the '几何原本' (Elements).\"<|>\"mathematical foundation, Euclidean geometry\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"The triangle inequality is a concept that aligns with the propositions in Euclid's '几何原本' (Elements).\"<|>\"mathematical theory, geometric principles\"<|>7)##\n(\"content_keywords\"<|>\"geometry, triangle inequality, Euclidean principles, mathematical proof\")<|COMPLETE|>",
      "cache_type": "extract",
      "chunk_id": "chunk-ef3b02e287fdeed2cfb0e7a47324ffef",
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "---Goal---\nGiven a text document that is potentially relevant to this activity and a list of entity types, identify all entities of those types from the text and all relationships among the identified entities.\nUse English as output language.\n\n---Steps---\n1. Identify all entities. For each identified entity, extract the following information:\n- entity_name: Name of the entity, use same language as input text. If English, capitalized the name.\n- entity_type: One of the following types: [organization,person,geo,event,category]\n- entity_description: Comprehensive description of the entity's attributes and activities\nFormat each entity as (\"entity\"<|><entity_name><|><entity_type><|><entity_description>)\n\n2. From the entities identified in step 1, identify all pairs of (source_entity, target_entity) that are *clearly related* to each other.\nFor each pair of related entities, extract the following information:\n- source_entity: name of the source entity, as identified in step 1\n- target_entity: name of the target entity, as identified in step 1\n- relationship_description: explanation as to why you think the source entity and the target entity are related to each other\n- relationship_strength: a numeric score indicating strength of the relationship between the source entity and target entity\n- relationship_keywords: one or more high-level key words that summarize the overarching nature of the relationship, focusing on concepts or themes rather than specific details\nFormat each relationship as (\"relationship\"<|><source_entity><|><target_entity><|><relationship_description><|><relationship_keywords><|><relationship_strength>)\n\n3. Identify high-level key words that summarize the main concepts, themes, or topics of the entire text. These should capture the overarching ideas present in the document.\nFormat the content-level key words as (\"content_keywords\"<|><high_level_keywords>)\n\n4. Return output in English as a single list of all the entities and relationships identified in steps 1 and 2. Use **##** as the list delimiter.\n\n5. When finished, output <|COMPLETE|>\n\n######################\n---Examples---\n######################\nExample 1:\n\nEntity_types: [person, technology, mission, organization, location]\nText:\n```\nwhile Alex clenched his jaw, the buzz of frustration dull against the backdrop of Taylor's authoritarian certainty. It was this competitive undercurrent that kept him alert, the sense that his and Jordan's shared commitment to discovery was an unspoken rebellion against Cruz's narrowing vision of control and order.\n\nThen Taylor did something unexpected. They paused beside Jordan and, for a moment, observed the device with something akin to reverence. \"If this tech can be understood...\" Taylor said, their voice quieter, \"It could change the game for us. For all of us.\"\n\nThe underlying dismissal earlier seemed to falter, replaced by a glimpse of reluctant respect for the gravity of what lay in their hands. Jordan looked up, and for a fleeting heartbeat, their eyes locked with Taylor's, a wordless clash of wills softening into an uneasy truce.\n\nIt was a small transformation, barely perceptible, but one that Alex noted with an inward nod. They had all been brought here by different paths\n```\n\nOutput:\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Alex\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Alex is a character who experiences frustration and is observant of the dynamics among other characters.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Taylor\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Taylor is portrayed with authoritarian certainty and shows a moment of reverence towards a device, indicating a change in perspective.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Jordan\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Jordan shares a commitment to discovery and has a significant interaction with Taylor regarding a device.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"Cruz\"<|>\"person\"<|>\"Cruz is associated with a vision of control and order, influencing the dynamics among other characters.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"The Device\"<|>\"technology\"<|>\"The Device is central to the story, with potential game-changing implicatio
    },
    "354710b7faf6e2ee08535b60dfc6a77c": {
      "return": "(\"entity\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A geometric figure used in the proof of the triangle inequality, with points A, B, and C forming its vertices.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A constructed point in the proof, created by extending line AB and making BD equal in length to BC.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A fundamental geometric principle stating that the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"Also known as the parallel postulate, it states that if a straight line intersects two others and forms interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two lines will meet on that side.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"Euclid's foundational work on geometry, containing definitions, postulates, and proofs that form the basis of classical geometry.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A triangle formed in the proof with BD = BC, exhibiting equal angles opposite the equal sides.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"角∠BDC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"An angle in triangle BCD, equal to ∠BCD due to the triangle being isosceles.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"角∠BCD\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"An angle in triangle BCD, equal to ∠BDC due to the triangle being isosceles.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"角∠ACD\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"An angle in the proof that is shown to be greater than ∠ADC, leading to the conclusion about side lengths.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"角∠ADC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"An angle in the proof that is shown to be less than ∠ACD, supporting the triangle inequality proof.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"边AD\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A line segment in the proof whose length is compared to AC to demonstrate the triangle inequality.\")##\n(\"entity\"<|>\"边AC\"<|>\"category\"<|>\"A side of triangle ABC whose length is compared to AD in the inequality proof.\")##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The triangle ABC serves as the primary example for demonstrating the triangle inequality theorem.\"<|>\"geometric proof, inequality\"<|>10)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"三角形ABC\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"Point D is constructed from triangle ABC by extending side AB and making BD equal to BC.\"<|>\"construction, geometric extension\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"点D\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"Point D is one vertex of the isosceles triangle BCD created in the proof.\"<|>\"geometric construction, isosceles triangle\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"等腰三角形BCD\"<|>\"角∠BDC\"<|>\"The isosceles triangle BCD has equal angles ∠BDC and ∠BCD due to its equal sides.\"<|>\"angle properties, isosceles triangle\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"欧几里得第五公理\"<|>\"角∠ACD\"<|>\"Euclid's fifth postulate is used to establish that ∠ACD is greater than ∠ADC.\"<|>\"angle comparison, geometric postulate\"<|>8)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"几何原本\"<|>\"三角不等式\"<|>\"The triangle inequality is a concept consistent with the geometric principles established in Euclid's Elements.\"<|>\"mathematical foundation, geometric theory\"<|>9)##\n(\"relationship\"<|>\"边AD\"<|>\"边AC\"<|>\"The proof concludes that AD (sum of AB and BC) is greater than AC, demonstrating the triangle inequality.\"<|>\"side comparison, inequality proof\"<|>10)##\n(\"content_keywords\"<|>\"geometry, triangle inequality, Euclidean geometry, proof, angles, sides\")<|COMPLETE|>",
      "cache_type": "extract",
      "chunk_id": "chunk-ef3b02e287fdeed2cfb0e7a47324ffef",
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"---Goal---\\nGiven a text document that is potentially relevant to this activity and a list of entity types, identify all entities of those types from the text and all relationships among the identified entities.\\nUse English as output language.\\n\\n---Steps---\\n1. Identify all entities. For each identified entity, extract the following information:\\n- entity_name: Name of the entity, use same language as input text. If English, capitalized the name.\\n- entity_type: One of the following types: [organization,person,geo,event,category]\\n- entity_description: Comprehensive description of the entity's attributes and activities\\nFormat each entity as (\\\"entity\\\"<|><entity_name><|><entity_type><|><entity_description>)\\n\\n2. From the entities identified in step 1, identify all pairs of (source_entity, target_entity) that are *clearly related* to each other.\\nFor each pair of related entities, extract the following information:\\n- source_entity: name of the source entity, as identified in step 1\\n- target_entity: name of the target entity, as identified in step 1\\n- relationship_description: explanation as to why you think the source entity and the target entity are related to each other\\n- relationship_strength: a numeric score indicating strength of the relationship between the source entity and target entity\\n- relationship_keywords: one or more high-level key words that summarize the overarching nature of the relationship, focusing on concepts or themes rather than specific details\\nFormat each relationship as (\\\"relationship\\\"<|><source_entity><|><target_entity><|><relationship_description><|><relationship_keywords><|><relationship_strength>)\\n\\n3. Identify high-level key words that summarize the main concepts, themes, or topics of the entire text. These should capture the overarching ideas present in the document.\\nFormat the content-level key words as (\\\"content_keywords\\\"<|><high_level_keywords>)\\n\\n4. Return output in English as a single list of all the entities and relationships identified in steps 1 and 2. Use **##** as the list delimiter.\\n\\n5. When finished, output <|COMPLETE|>\\n\\n######################\\n---Examples---\\n######################\\nExample 1:\\n\\nEntity_types: [person, technology, mission, organization, location]\\nText:\\n```\\nwhile Alex clenched his jaw, the buzz of frustration dull against the backdrop of Taylor's authoritarian certainty. It was this competitive undercurrent that kept him alert, the sense that his and Jordan's shared commitment to discovery was an unspoken rebellion against Cruz's narrowing vision of control and order.\\n\\nThen Taylor did something unexpected. They paused beside Jordan and, for a moment, observed the device with something akin to reverence. \\\"If this tech can be understood...\\\" Taylor said, their voice quieter, \\\"It could change the game for us. For all of us.\\\"\\n\\nThe underlying dismissal earlier seemed to falter, replaced by a glimpse of reluctant respect for the gravity of what lay in their hands. Jordan looked up, and for a fleeting heartbeat, their eyes locked with Taylor's, a wordless clash of wills softening into an uneasy truce.\\n\\nIt was a small transformation, barely perceptible, but one that Alex noted with an inward nod. They had all been brought here by different paths\\n```\\n\\nOutput:\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Alex\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Alex is a character who experiences frustration and is observant of the dynamics among other characters.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Taylor\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Taylor is portrayed with authoritarian certainty and shows a moment of reverence towards a device, indicating a change in perspective.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Jordan\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Jordan shares a commitment to discovery and has a significant interaction with Taylor regarding a device.\\\")##\\n(\\\"entity\\\"<|>\\\"Cruz\\\"<|>\\\"person\\\"<|>\\\"Cruz is associated with a vision of control and order, influencing t
    }
  },
  "hybrid": {
    "e512955f204ab45619d21f9368b2d721": {
      "return": "{\"high_level_keywords\": [\"\\u51e0\\u4f55\\u8bc1\\u660e\", \"\\u4e09\\u89d2\\u5f62\\u6027\\u8d28\", \"\\u6570\\u5b66\\u5b9a\\u7406\"], \"low_level_keywords\": [\"\\u4e24\\u8fb9\\u4e4b\\u548c\", \"\\u7b2c\\u4e09\\u8fb9\", \"\\u4e0d\\u7b49\\u5f0f\", \"\\u6b27\\u51e0\\u91cc\\u5f97\\u51e0\\u4f55\"]}",
      "cache_type": "keywords",
      "chunk_id": null,
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "三角形两边之和大于第三边的证明"
    },
    "b77e26c8086abbf8d809e39b1e55a4d4": {
      "return": "{\"high_level_keywords\": [\"\\u4e09\\u89d2\\u5f62\", \"\\u51e0\\u4f55\\u8bc1\\u660e\", \"\\u6570\\u5b66\\u5b9a\\u7406\"], \"low_level_keywords\": [\"\\u4e24\\u8fb9\\u4e4b\\u548c\\u5927\\u4e8e\\u7b2c\\u4e09\\u8fb9\", \"\\u8fb9\\u957f\\u5173\\u7cfb\", \"\\u4e09\\u89d2\\u5f62\\u4e0d\\u7b49\\u5f0f\"]}",
      "cache_type": "keywords",
      "chunk_id": null,
      "embedding": null,
      "embedding_shape": null,
      "embedding_min": null,
      "embedding_max": null,
      "original_prompt": "三角形中两边之和大于第三边的证明"
    }
  }
}